Has anyone else had issues with Southwest WiFi cutting out or being super slow during a flight? I paid for it on my last trip so I could work, but pages barely loaded and streaming was impossible. I’m trying to figure out if I just had bad luck on that plane or if Southwest’s in-flight WiFi is usually this unreliable before I spend money on it again. Any tips, refunds, or workarounds that actually help?
Southwest WiFi is hit or miss, and you got one of the miss flights.
Some points from my flights the last year or so:
-
Provider and tech
• Southwest uses Viasat on most newer aircraft and Anuvu (old Global Eagle) on others.
• Viasat planes tend to be faster and more stable.
• The older system crawls once a few people start streaming, even if they say “no streaming.” -
Typical performance
• On good flights I see 5–15 Mbps down, enough for email, Slack, light web, even low‑res YouTube.
• On bad flights it drops under 1 Mbps or times out, like what you saw.
• Congestion hits hardest at peak times and on full flights. -
Use it for work, not for heavy stuff
• Fine for email, Docs, basic web.
• Painful for big file uploads, VPN, code repos, big cloud dashboards.
• Streaming is unreliable, even when it loads once or twice. -
Refunds and credits
• If it fails on a flight, hit the “contact us” section on Southwest’s site after.
• Mention flight number, date, and that paid WiFi did not work.
• I have gotten the WiFi fee refunded or a small voucher every time it was useless. -
Ways to make it less awful
• Turn off auto‑sync on OneDrive, Dropbox, iCloud so you do not flood the link.
• Kill background apps on your laptop and phone.
• Use mobile‑friendly versions of sites instead of heavy desktop ones.
• If VPN kills it, try only turning on VPN when you need to send something sensitive. -
When it is not worth it
• If you need stable video or Zoom, I would not depend on it.
• If your work is very bandwidth heavy, treat it as a backup, not your main plan.
• For short flights, I skip it and queue offline work.
If you work from home or in offices a lot and want fewer WiFi headaches overall, a tool like NetSpot helps. You install it on your laptop, walk around your place or office, and map weak spots, channel conflicts, and interference. That way you can pick better router spots and channels. Check out this NetSpot WiFi analyzer and planner and tune your setup on the ground, since the air stuff is out of your control.
Short version for Southwest WiFi
• Yes, lots of people see slow or broken service.
• It depends heavily on the aircraft and how full the flight is.
• It is ok for email and light work.
• It is not dependable for streaming or heavy business use.
• Always ask for a refund if it barely works.
Yeah, you’re not alone. Southwest WiFi is basically a coin flip, and you clearly got tails.
On my last 5 SW flights:
- 2 were actually solid for work stuff (email, Docs, Slack, light browsing)
- 1 was barely usable
- 2 were what you’re describing: pages timing out, “connected” but nothing loading, streaming not even in the conversation
I half‑disagree slightly with @reveurdenuit on the “use it for work” part. It can be fine for work, but I treat it as “bonus if it works” not “mission critical.” If I absolutely need to be productive, I plan like the WiFi won’t exist at all.
What I do now:
-
Decide if it’s worth paying
- If the flight is under ~2 hours: I don’t bother. I queue offline docs, download emails, and just sync when I land.
- If it’s a longer leg and I might get stuff done: I’ll pay, but I assume it could be trash and I won’t rely on it for calls or big uploads.
-
Test early and be ruthless
- As soon as we hit 10k ft, I connect, run a quick speed test or just load a few heavy pages.
- If after ~10–15 minutes it’s still spinning and failing, I screenshot the “connected” screen and note the time. That makes it much easier to get a refund later.
- If it sort of works but chokes constantly, I’ll still log it as “didn’t function as advertised” when I contact Southwest after the flight.
-
What I actually use it for
- Checking email without big attachments
- Chat tools set to low‑bandwidth mode
- Text‑heavy sites
- Maybe a low‑res YouTube video if I’m on a known good Viasat plane and the flight isn’t packed
If I need Zoom / Teams / big code pulls / large cloud dashboards, I just assume “nope.” Anything that needs steady throughput is asking for a meltdown.
-
Definitely ask for refunds
Even if it “kind of” worked but was way under usable for what they imply, I’d still write in. Mention time ranges it failed, flight number, and that you paid specifically to work and could not do so. I’ve had them return the WiFi fee and toss a small voucher now and then. You shouldn’t eat the cost for unusable service. -
Expectation setting for next time
If your main need in flight is reliable connectivity, Southwest WiFi is not worth betting your day on. Think of it like:- Great if it works
- Acceptable for light tasks
- A trap if you’re counting on streaming or real‑time calls
On the home/office side, where you at least control something, a proper WiFi analyzer helps you avoid blaming the airline when the real issue is your laptop just struggling in general. Tools like NetSpot let you walk around your place, find signal dead zones, channel conflicts, and interference so your baseline connection is solid. If you want to tune your setup, this is worth a look:
boost your WiFi speed and reliability
And since you mentioned you paid specifically so you could work, I’d 100% treat that last experience as a data point: for future trips on Southwest, assume WiFi is a “maybe” and prep offline tasks first, then pay only if you’re okay with it being a gamble.
1 Like
Southwest WiFi is basically three things at once: the underlying satellite link, the specific aircraft hardware, and whatever everyone else on board is doing. You got unlucky on at least two of those.
I mostly agree with @kakeru and @reveurdenuit, but I’m a bit less forgiving about “it’s fine for work.” If your definition of work is “poke at email and chat,” sure. If it is “move real files, stay on a stable connection, and not want to throw your laptop,” I would not count on it at all.
A few angles that have not been covered yet:
1. How to tell if it is going to be trash within 5 minutes
Instead of speed tests, I look at behavior:
- Does a light page like a plain news article or Wikipedia load in under 3–4 seconds?
- Does it stall in the middle of loading images or just hang on “resolving host”?
- Does the captive portal randomly reappear?
If two or more of those are happening early in the flight, I mentally write the WiFi off as “email check only” and stop fighting it. That saves you from spending an hour tweaking settings hoping it will magically become Zoom capable.
2. Why streaming is especially bad on Southwest
Even on the “better” Viasat planes, streaming kills everyone’s experience because:
- The air link is a shared pipe with hard limits.
- The onboard system often does not effectively throttle heavy users.
- A couple of folks forcing 720p+ video can chop the available bandwidth for the rest of the cabin.
So your experience of “pages barely loaded and streaming was impossible” is not unusual. It is exactly what happens when the pipe is congested and the system does a mediocre job of fairness. I would treat “no streaming” as a hard rule, even if the portal pretends it might be okay.
3. When it is worth paying
This is where I disagree slightly with both of them:
- If you are on a long flight (3+ hours) and your work is asynchronous and text heavy, it can still be worth the gamble, even with Southwest’s inconsistency. Over a few hours you typically get windows of acceptable performance, and that can be enough to triage email, review docs, or move a few small tasks forward.
- If you are on a short hop or need real‑time reliability (calls, pair programming, large dashboards), then no, it is not worth the fee or the frustration. Treat the cabin like offline mode.
I think of it like paying for a noisy coworking space. You are not paying for perfection, you are paying for a chance to get some things done.
4. What to do differently next time
Instead of focusing only on Southwest knobs, change your work plan for flight days:
- Split tasks into:
- “Must be online”
- “Nice to have online”
- “Fully offline friendly”
- Load your laptop with as much “fully offline” as possible before you leave. Drafts, local copies of docs, queued code reviews, downloaded research.
- If you end up with usable WiFi, great, shift some “must be online” tasks forward. If not, you are still productive.
That mindset shift matters more than any single trick.
5. About your own device and WiFi baseline
One thing hardly anyone mentions: a weak or flaky WiFi setup at home can make you underestimate how sensitive your laptop is to marginal networks. If your drivers or configuration are already suboptimal, airline WiFi exposes that instantly.
This is where a tool like NetSpot actually helps, but not mid‑flight. You use it on the ground to clean up your normal environment:
Pros of NetSpot:
- Gives you a visual heatmap so you see exactly where signal drops in your home or office.
- Highlights channel conflicts and interference, so you can pick better router channels and placements instead of guessing.
- Helps you notice if your device is the bottleneck or if your router setup is weak.
Cons of NetSpot:
- It will not and cannot fix Southwest or any in‑flight WiFi. It only optimizes networks you control.
- Some of its deeper features are overkill if you just want a quick “is my WiFi OK?” answer.
- You still need a bit of networking common sense to act on what it shows you.
Used correctly, NetSpot makes sure your laptop is tuned and stable on a solid network, so when Southwest is slow you can be confident the problem is truly in the sky, not on your machine.
6. How your experience compares
To sync with what @kakeru and @reveurdenuit said, but from a slightly different angle:
- They are right that it is “hit or miss” and that refunds are worth chasing.
- I am more in the camp of: never assume it will be “good for work,” only “possibly useful” for light work.
- If your last flight was unusable, that is not you being picky. That is the system failing at the basic “email and browsing” promise, and getting your WiFi fee back is completely reasonable.
Bottom line: you did not do anything wrong. Southwest’s in‑flight internet is a roll of the dice, and for anything important you should plan as if it will not exist, then treat any working connection as a bonus.